Science, Fiction, Life

Category: Uncategorized (Page 4 of 4)

Diversity in (my) Speculative Fiction

As an aspiring author and a science fiction and fantasy (SFF) fan, I follow a lot of authors and science fiction and fantasy fans on twitter. Twitter is a great way to feel connected to the fandom community and to well-known authors. And despite its reputation, twitter is also a place where, from time to time, really important conversations happen.

Last week, the SFF twitterverse exploded with the hashtag #DiversityinSFF, and it was great. The stereotypical SFF fan is a socially inept straight white male, but in reality all sorts of people enjoy science fiction and fantasy. That’s because… are you ready for this? All sorts of people enjoy good stories!

Lots of others have opined about this, and done it far more eloquently than I can. I encourage you to go take a look at the #DiversityinSFF hashtag and start reading. But the conversations on twitter made me think a bit about my own writing and that’s what I’d like to unpack a bit here.

With the help of the Magic Spreadsheet, I recently (finally) started writing a first draft of the novel I’ve been thinking about for a long time. So far it is terrible, of course. I am out of practice as a writer, and it’s a first draft, so the most important thing right now is to get the words on the page. But despite its many flaws, I am happy to say my novel is doing pretty well on the diversity front.

This is intentional, but it has nothing to do with the recent #Diversityin SFF tweetsplosion. I have had the seed of this novel idea for years, and it goes back to the realization that the overwhelming majority of fantasy novels are based on an extremely narrow range of time and place. That is: western Europe in the late middle ages. When I started to think about what I liked in fiction, the common denominator was “something different”. I like novels where cultures clash, where I get to experience new ideas, new cultures, and new places. It would be easy to write yet another Tolkien rip-off fantasy, but they say to write the book you want to read. I love me some Tolkien, but I want to read something different, so that’s what I’m trying to write.

My novel is based loosely on the Spanish conquest of the Inca empire, but is set in an alternate world, which gives me flexibility that true historical fiction doesn’t allow. Although I had the vague notion of an Inca-inspired historical fantasy for years, the idea was kicked into high gear when I visited Peru earlier this year.

On the flight down, and while we were there, I read the book “The Last Days of the Incas” by Kim MacQuarrie. It’s a very readable historical account of the end of the Inca empire, and I was fascinated by one detail in particular: When the Spanish conquistadors first arrived, they took two young boys with them back to Spain. Those boys learned to speak Spanish, and when Pizarro and his men came back to Peru, these two Inca boys served as the only translators between the Spanish and the Inca emperor. Can you imagine being put in that position? The fate of two empires depending on how well you translate a language you’ve barely learned?

One of my main characters is based on those two translators. The other main character is his twin sister, who remains behind and sees the ravages of smallpox and civil war on the empire while the conquistadors are preparing to return.

With the #DiversityinSFF tweetsplosion last week, I paused and took stock of my novel. The main characters are not white. The main setting is not medieval Europe. It passes the Bechdel test by the second chapter (this was completely inadvertent, it just tends to happen when you have real female characters). So yeah, while it is the steaming pile of suck that all proper first drafts must be, it at least has a bit of diversity going for it,

I should say that I am well aware that I am playing through life on easy mode and have benefited greatly from doing so. I have never experienced the inability to see myself in the characters in fiction that I read because straight while males are vastly over-represented in fiction. For my first novel, it would be easy to write about someone like me, in a familiar setting. They say write what you know, but you know what? That novel would be boring. As Charles Stross said on twitter:

“The biggest argument for #diversityinSFF —monocultures are BORING. (Even if the monoculture is your culture: still tediously unchallenging.)”

I agree, except I would amend that to say especially if the monoculture is your culture.

I am going into this novel-writing thing with my eyes open. Of course I dream that someday the novel will be really good and I will sell it and it will be read by millions. But in reality the most likely outcome is that I will write it and it will not be as good as I want it to be and it will not be published. Even if that happens, I will learn something, and I’ll learn more by challenging myself. I’m well aware of the challenges and possible pitfalls of writing the other and cultural appropriation. But for now, the important thing is to try something different and learn as much as I can in the process.

 

Movie Review: Elysium

It’s been a long time since I went to see a movie in the theater. The last one was Les Miserables; since then nothing has really piqued my interest enough to carve out a couple hours of my weekend to go see it. But Elysium looked awesome, so I made time today to go check it out.

elysium-firstposter-full2

The premise behind the movie is this: all the rich people have left the earth and live on an orbiting space station paradise called Elysium. Up there, everything is wonderful, and every house comes equipped with a magical machine that can instantly cure any ailment, from cuts and bruises to terminal cancer and catastrophic injury. Meanwhile Earth is overcrowded and everyone lives in slums with little or no access to health care. The story centers around Max (Matt Damon), a worker from Earth who gets into an industrial accident and has days to live. So he needs to find a way to get to Elysium to get cured. On the other side, Jodie Foster plays the evil lady in charge of security on the station, and she is hell-bent on keeping “illegals” from coming up. She wants even more power, and so she hatches a scheme that will place her in full control of the station. From there, a lot of fighting and blowing things up ensues.

There was a lot of pressure for director Neill Blomkamp to make something that lived up to District 9, but Elysium had a vastly larger budget, and so inevitably, felt much more like a popcorn-munching big summer blockbuster, which is exactly what it is. Still, Elysium borrows a lot, stylistically, from District 9. It has the same gritty, dirty-looking future, and a proclivity for futuristic (but not too futuristic) guns that blow people apart in creative ways.

The design for the Elysium space station itself borrows heavily from early NASA plans for space colonies from the heady days just after Apollo, when it felt like we could do anything in space.  Just take a look at this concept art from NASA:

AC75-2621

 

 

 

Now, compare it with these screenshots that I took from the trailer:Elysium_station1

Elysium_station

 

I went into Elysium expecting some heavy-handedness in terms of the message and got exactly what I expected: the movie is unashamedly a parable about inequality, particularly as it relates to health care, income, and immigration. Other than Matt Damon, the good guys are almost all Latino, so when they infiltrate Elysium and Jodie Foster is shouting about catching the “illegals”, it’s not exactly subtle.

But really, that’s ok with me. At least the movie has something to say underneath the heavy layer of special effects and action. Instead, my two main gripes with the movie are: 1.the science fictional ground rules aren’t established well enough, and 2. The villains aren’t fully developed characters.

I’ll warn you, I am going to get slightly spoilery at this point, so if you don’t read on, here’s the bottom line: Elysium is a fine action movie, and you should go see it, especially because it is not a comic book or a sequel to anything, and lord knows we need more originality in Hollywood. Just don’t expect profound philosophical examination of the issues raised by the premise. Do expect people being blown apart in creative ways and exciting fight sequences.

Ok. Now, on to my two main gripes. First: the science fictional ground rules. What I mean when I say this is that, in speculative fiction, the audience needs to know quite clearly what rules have been changed. What can happen in the fictional world that cannot (at least not yet) happen in our world. So in Elysium some things are clear: they have small car-sized craft that can launch into orbit, they have technology that can identifying every human being alive, they have medical pods on Elysium that can cure anything. The problem that I had was with the medical care on Earth. We’re told in no uncertain terms that they can’t “just cure” people on Earth, but it’s not exactly clear what they can do.

This ambiguity was frustrating when the main character got injured. For example, at one point he gets stabbed in the stomach. He stumbles to meet with the love interest, who is a nurse, and she slaps some gauze on his wound and hooks him up to an IV, and by the next day he is up and fighting again. That’s some pretty miraculous medicine in my book! Likewise, when he gets an exoskeleton installed, we are shown some wince-inducing views of staples and screws and bolts being tightened into his flesh and bones. Next day, he’s up and about!

But other characters on Earth don’t seem so invincible. Early on we are shown a pair of “illegals” who sneak onto Elysium to get the little girl’s broken legs fixed. So… broken legs require Elysium’s miraculous medical pods, but when Matt Damon breaks a limb, or has massive, body-wide surgery, he is fine in a matter of hours.

Likewise, much of the plot centers around technology that allows computer programs and other sensitive information to be stored in people’s brains. There is a security protocol activated on one of these files that has major ramifications for the plot, but it is not well explained, and if you think about it too much, it doesn’t make much sense.

That said, on to my other, more important issue with the movie: the villains. Jodie Foster did her best with what she was given, but we are given zero backstory on why she is such an evil person. Why does she want to use excessive force on “illegals”? Why is she so hate-filled? Spending even a little time exploring this would have made it easier to see things from her point of view, and the best villains are always the ones who are not just mustache-twirling caricatures, but actually have a method to their madness. A good villain is one who you can almost sympathize with, who you find yourself wondering what you would do in their shoes, given their past experiences. Alas, Jodie Foster’s character mostly just is evil so that the protagonists have someone to oppose.

The second villain begins as Jodie Foster’s henchman and if anything he is even more poorly developed. He  basically just seems to be a crazy guy with access to military weapons and a desire to use them on people. It’s not clear why Jodie Foster likes using him and it’s not clear why he does what he does. Considering that he eventually takes over as the main villain, any backstory at all would have been helpful.

Both of my major gripes could have been easily addressed with just a little bit more time, and would have made the movie more satisfying. As it is, it feels like the movie is in a rush to get to the action scenes at the expense of the backstory that makes those scenes meaningful.

Still, I have to admit that I enjoyed the movie. Despite its flaws, it’s an above-average summer blockbuster. It may be heavy-handed, but at least it does have a message. And most importantly, it is not yet another freakin’ comic book movie or sequel or franchise reboot. By my count, 7 of the 12 movies at our local theater are sequels. Given the astonishing lack of originality in Hollywood these days, I was happy to do my little part in supporting some original science fiction. If you like dystopian sci-fi, and can handle gore and profanity, I encourage you to go give Elysium a try. It’s not perfect, but it’s at least something new.

 

Consolidating

Hello and welcome to my new personal blog. In the past I have been known to blog elsewhere, most notably at The Martian Chronicles over at the AGU blogosphere, but also at my short-lived blog about the Science of Starcraft where I looked at real-world science in the Starcraft video game series, and occasionally at Science in my Fiction. I haven’t posted much at any of these sites lately, so in an effort to consolidate my web presence and also perhaps revitalize my blogging, I’m starting up a personal blog here at my home page. I’m hoping that freeing myself from the restriction in subject matter that was inherent in my other blogs, I will be able to rekindle my blogging habit and hopefully keep readers from my previous blogs engaged. We shall see. You’ll notice that I have imported my archive of posts from Science of Starcraft to this blog. That’s because I’m going to be shutting down the actual science of Starcraft site.

What to expect on this blog? Oh, this and that. Some science certainly. Likely lots of posts about speculative fiction, including reviews of books, movies, and games, and samples of my own projects. Maybe some personal posts too. The main point is, this blog does not have a specific topic built into its title, so that frees me to write about what I want when I want to. It should be fun!

Newer posts »

© 2024 Ryan Anderson

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑